Modifications

Modifications Results

Recent Jury Trial Victory in Collin County for Dad

Issue: Dad decided to seek Modification of Prior Divorce Decree to Impose Geographical Restriction and keep Mom from moving the child to Tennessee.
Facts: Both parties were from another state (about 12 hours drive from Texas) but had moved to Texas in the early 2000’s. After living in Texas for few years, Dad and Mom divorced three years ago. At the time of the divorce, Mom wanted to return to the former state of residence with the child, Dad wanted to stay here. The parties compromised and settled in mediation for Mom staying in Texas for three more years. After the three years elapsed, Mom said she was returning to the former state. Dad hired me to modify the Decree to keep the geographical restriction in place permanently.After a temporary hearing where the Judge ordered the child to remain in Texas pending final trial, Mom demanded a Jury trial for final hearing.

Result: In a unanimous verdict, the jury found, as we requested for Dad, that there had been a material and substantial change in circumstances to justify modifying the Decree now tp impose a restriction on the child’s residence and that doing so would be in the child’s best interest. As a result, the Decree was modified to impose a geographical restriction on the child’s residence to Collin County and surrounding counties.Modification of Custody (Rockwall County)

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Issue and Result: Dad, divorced years earlier with one daughter, came to me seeking more visitation time with his child because he had finally gotten the chance to move closer to his ex-wife and daughter than he’d lived for a quite a while. We filed in court asking for “50-50” with realistically a goal of getting extended standard possession. Well, Mom fiercely opposed him getting any more time and it turned out the judge philosophically opposed “50-50” unless the parties lived in the same school area. After the suit was filed, his daughter began saying she wanted to live with Dad.

We amended our suit to ask for primary custody and requested a social study to have the girl interviewed. The study confirmed the child’s desire to live with her Dad. In addition, we also had uncovered some evidence against Mom and her current husband in deposition.
Dad, who started out just wanting more visitation, ended up winning full, primary custody, moving his daughter to new school, with Mom having standard visitation and paying child support.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Modification of Custody (Rockwall County)
Issue and Result: H and W divorced several years prior. Tensions built. Then, after his ex- W came to his house one time with her current police officer husband and caused an ugly scene, with cursing, name calling, threatening Dad and his wife in front of the child, then denying possession for a month in the form of telling the child not to go with his Dad for visits while putting the child out on the front porch to tell his Dad “he didn’t want to go”, Dad finally hired me. We won Dad custody of the child.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Modification of Custody (Collin County)
Issue and Result:Dad hired me because his son’s 2nd grade age child reported facts to his teacher indicating that he had been kicked out of his home in the cold by his mom, that mom had yelled at and slapped him, and other concerns. We filed for a modification of custody and got an emergency order followed by a temporary hearing. We subpoena’d the teachers and school counselor, who confirmed what Dad had been told. Dad won custody. Mom required to undergo psychotherapy and pay child support.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Modification of Custody (Dallas County)
Issue and Result: Dad hired me bc his ex wife, the primary custodial parent, had suddenly fallen in love with another man who lived in another city several hundred miles away and wanted to take the child with her. We stopped the move and eventually got custody. She chose to move away even if she couldn’t take her child with her. She now has standard possession and pays all her own travel expenses to visit with the child.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Issue: Dad decided to seek Modification of Prior Divorce Decree to Impose Geographical Restriction and keep Mom from moving the child to Tennessee.
Facts:
 Both parties were from another state (about 12 hours drive from Texas) but had moved to Texas in the early 2000’s. After living in Texas for few years, Dad and Mom divorced three years ago. At the time of the divorce, Mom wanted to return to the former state of residence with the child, Dad wanted to stay here. The parties compromised and settled in mediation for Mom staying in Texas for three more years. After the three years elapsed, Mom said she was returning to the former state. Dad hired me to modify the Decree to keep the geographical restriction in place permanently.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

After a temporary hearing where the Judge ordered the child to remain in Texas pending final trial, Mom demanded a Jury trial for final hearing.
Result: In a unanimous verdict, the jury found, as we requested for Dad, that there had been a material and substantial change in circumstances to justify modifying the Decree now tp impose a restriction on the child’s residence and that doing so would be in the child’s best interest. As a result, the Decree was modified to impose a geographical restriction on the child’s residence to Collin County and surrounding counties.Issue:Modification of two-year-old divorce. Father had obtained standard rights in divorce. Mother was a stay-at-home mom with no bad facts against her other than her refusal to co-parent with Father.
Result: Obtained modification to give father equal possession and rights.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Issue: Modification of custody in Dallas County involving 3 y/o and 5 y/o girls.
Result: Modified custody and won primary for father. Mom was given SPO and ordered to pay guideline CS.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Issue: Father, an executive with a large company, wanted to achieve a more equal parenting status with his children than he received in his divorce. He wanted approximately equal time, lowered child support, more decision-making powers, etc. Before hiring us, former spouse refused to consider any changes.
Result: We set the case for jury trial. Just before trial, ex-wife agreed to a settlement, giving our client virtually everything he’d requested.Issue: Dad decided to seek Modification of Prior Divorce Decree to Impose Geographical Restriction and keep Mom from moving the child to Tennessee.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Issue: Both parties were from another state (about 12 hours drive from Texas) but had moved to Texas in the early 2000’s. After living in Texas for few years, Dad and Mom divorced three years ago. At the time of the divorce, Mom wanted to return to the former state of residence with the child, Dad wanted to stay here. The parties compromised and settled in mediation for Mom staying in Texas for three more years. After the three years elapsed, Mom said she was returning to the former state. Dad hired me to modify the Decree to keep the geographical restriction in place permanently. After a temporary hearing where the Judge ordered the child to remain in Texas pending final trial, Mom demanded a Jury trial for final hearing.
Result: In a unanimous verdict, the jury found, as we requested for Dad, that there had been a material and substantial change in circumstances to justify modifying the Decree now to impose a restriction on the child’s residence and that doing so would be in the child’s best interest. As a result, the Decree was modified to impose a geographical restriction on the child’s residence to Collin County and surrounding counties.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Issue: Modification of two-year-old divorce. Father had obtained standard rights in divorce. Mother was a stay-at-home mom with no bad facts against her other than her refusal to co-parent with Father.
Result: Obtained modification to give father equal possession and rights.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Issue: Modification of custody in Dallas County involving 3 y/o and 5 y/o girls.
Result: Modified custody and won primary for father. Mom was given SPO and ordered to pay guideline CS.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Issue: Father, an executive with a large company, wanted to achieve a more equal parenting status with his children than he received in his divorce. He wanted approximately equal time, lowered child support, more decision-making powers, etc. Before hiring us, former spouse refused to consider any changes.
Result: We set the case for jury trial. Just before trial, ex-wife capitulated in mediation and gave our client virtually everything he’d requested.

phone

(972) 737-8397

fax

(214)-556- 0865

email

Jrb@boydfamilylaw.com

phone

(972) 737-8397

fax

(214)-556- 0865

email

Jrb@boydfamilylaw.com